|
|||
|
This is incredibly disappointing to me. I am VERY pro-life and I find this news upsetting. I even know pro-choice people who find partial birth abortions appalling. for info on partial birth abortion go here: ...the majority of fetuses aborted this way (partial birth abortion) are alive until the end of the procedure. The entire infant is delivered except the head. A scissors is jammed into the base of the skull. A tube is inserted into the skull, and the brain is sucked out. The now-dead infant is pulled out. The drawings illustrate this. Well the gist of the story is that a supreme court judge reversed bush's ban on partial birth abortions. NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday ruled against the government's ban on so-called partial birth abortions, saying the measure signed into law last year by President Bush was unconstitutional. [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by CustomerDisservice |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsPolitics and Crime (Assorted topics)Partial Birth Abortions are Back |
|
|||
|
But this is actually just another TYPE of abortion. Is it what you dislike? The type? Because the time (20th week) is like in other abortions. I watched the whole Senate debate yesterday. I lost count of how many times pro-life senators used language implying that the procedure they were banning was a birth interrupted by an abortion. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Rick Santorum, opened the debate by saying, "The term 'partial birth' comes from the fact that the baby is partially born, is in the process of being delivered. … Here is this child who is literally inches away from being born, who would otherwise be born alive." Majority Leader Bill Frist, the Senate's only doctor, concluded the debate by describing the procedure as "destroying the body of a mature unborn child."
President Bush exploits the same illusion. In his State of the Union address this year, he said the bill would "protect infants at the very hour of their birth." That's just false. This procedure doesn't take place anywhere near the appointed hour of birth. If you paid close attention to the Senate debate, you might have noticed the part where Santorum said the procedure was performed "at least 20 weeks, and in many cases, 21, 22, 23, 24 weeks [into pregnancy], and in rarer cases, beyond that." He didn't clarify how many of these abortions took place past the 20th week. A full-term pregnancy is 40 weeks. In 1992, the Supreme Court mentioned that viability could "sometimes" occur at 23 or 24 weeks. Santorum described a 1-pound fetus as "a fully formed baby," noting that while it was only at 20 weeks gestation, it had a complete set of features and extremities. But according to the National Center for Health Statistics, the survival rate for babies born weighing 500 grams or less—that's 1 pound, 1 ounce or less—is 14 percent. posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
i don't like any abortions unless the pregnancy is endangering the life of the mother posted by CustomerDisservice |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
What if a 15 year old girl was raped by the uncle AND grand-father and sonographt shows the baby has 2 heads. Would that qualify? It doesn't endanger the life. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
but why couldn't she give it up for adoption? posted by CustomerDisservice |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't that the preferred abortion method? Because it leaves body parts intact for further scientific research? However, that pic makes me sad... [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
off your site? c'mon now how bad could they have been? posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote: c'mon now how bad could they have been? It's not my fault that law makers are crazy. You can make sex, but cannot show it. And you can show abortions, but cannot make it. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
holy shit that is the most awful picture i have ever seen. Ever. posted by CustomerDisservice |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
dude seriously that's totally sick...i almost upchucked becasue of it. listen...if your gonna post stuff like that can you at least post a warning or PM me a warning cause im really queesy and that makes me wanna hurl i don't think i can look at it again. but that pic alone makes me hate people even more who do those types of abortions. its sick and wrong. the baby is almost full grown and yet people still don't think its killing...it is...dang i really hate this subject but im very pro-life you could say. so what if a woman wants to choose. should we let the moms of those woman choose too cause they choose to have you, whiney bitch... posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote: if your gonna post stuff like that can you at least post a warning or PM me a warning Warning! Reality. Happens thousands of times per year! Maybe this pic can save some babies life... posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
if you can show that on this forum but not some love making posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
im with knn even though that pic is sick and very disturbing its not as graphic as a porn pic posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
i can see no reason death shouldn't be censored over something that creates life.. which would you rather a child see if he had to see a picture...that dead mutilated baby or 2 people having sex? posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote: there something seriously wrong with the world if you can show that on this forum but not some love making Actually you get a lifetime for showing porn in China. And as you know abortions are mandatory in China: IMO → Life sentence in Chinese prison for putting porn online posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 22 May 2012, 06:24 php B.B. |