In-My-Opinion.org

»9/11 commission proves Bush wrong«







1) Yesterday Bush/Cheney spoke about top evidences for the Iraq+Al-Quaeda connection. Today the independent 9/11 commission  came to a different conclusion: No links found. Saddam even refused to work with Al-Quaeda.

2) Moreover, Bush's classification of rogue countries has no basis. No country has supported Al-Quaeda.

3) The head behind the 11.Sep. attacks was not Bin Laden.

That means that the 3 major targets of Bush's actions are wrong.


posted by knn

in-my-opinion.org -> Politics -> Bush, Kerry, Iraq -> 9/11 commission proves Bush wrong

Mohammed is already in captivity and probably tortured



The head of the WTC attacks :
Chalid Sheik Mohammed 


[CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE]


posted by knn
  

To sum up...



I think a T-Shirt my buddy has sums it up best...

"Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?"

Brilliant. White laugh

posted by GP
  



yes it was do you not read the articles...he was the one behind it. he made the orders to do it, he just sent someone to look after the planning. So in fact Laden was the head of it.

posted by Agent Zero
  

News Flash Bitches!



James Thompson FROM THE 9-11 COMMISSION was interviewed today and spoke out against the distorted headlines. He stated that there was no collaboration between Saddam and Al-Quida for the 9-11 attacks but went on to present a long list of connections between the two. No Saddam did not help with 9-11, but he has continued to support them and "meet" with them. He stated that their connections are undeniable.
KNN:
1) making numbered lists doesn't mean you have anything to say.
2)Getting your sources somewhere other than internet chatrooms is generally a good idea.
3)Making extreme statements that have not been supported by any amount of facts makes you sound even more stupid (if possible).
4)Read a book.

posted by liberal slayer
  



yes someone on my side once again! makes me all warm and fuzzy inside

posted by Agent Zero
  

Connections



Quote:
liberal slayer

Aaah, finally someone who can support Agent Zero! I was getting unhappy already. You are incredibly welcome, liberal slayer
Quote:
went on to present a long list of connections between the two. No Saddam did not help with 9-11, but he has continued to support them and "meet" with them

Just like Rumsfeld has continued to work with Iraq? Just like the connections between Bush and Bin Laden?

"Connections" or "Communication" of any kind don't actually mean something. The higher you get (politically, economically) the less people there are in those heights. Thus meeting someone from an oil family (Bin Laden) as an oil country leader (Saddam) doesn't mean much. That's also why I don't put too much weight into the Bush-Bin Laden connection.
Quote:
2)Getting your sources somewhere other than internet chatrooms is generally a good idea

I only get my statements from news sites.


posted by knn
  

All I'm Saying...



is that when people say that the 9-11 commision disproved the connections between the Saddam and Al-Quida they are flat out wrong. I'm stating that this connection cannot be proven or disproven at this time.

No they didn't collaborate for 9-11, but yes they have met, as well as other top members of each.

Saying that the 9-11 commision disproved connections between the two is false reporting, proving a liberal slant on the subject.
Read a book America!

posted by liberal slayer
  

War for meeting



Quote:
No they didn't collaborate for 9-11, but yes they have met, as well as other top members of each.

So Bush invaded this country because they met?


posted by knn
  

Read a newspaper!



Liberal Slayer could you stop telling everyone to read a book. It is very irritating.

Also, please remember that many of us are from countries other than America so when you address your statement to America it makes us feel left out. Many of us are from the UK or from Australia and there are several of us from other countries too.

Am reading "Beyond Good And Evil" by Friedrich Nietzsche. Tis very interesting:

"under conditions of peace the warlike man attacks himself"

"He who despises himself still respects himself nonetheless as one who despises"

posted by fatpie42
  "The beauty of the Superman came to me as a shadow. What are the gods to me now!"

Here a news site report



From
Quote:
The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks found "no credible evidence" of a link between Iraq and al-Qaeda in attacks against the United States, contradicting President Bush's assertion that such a connection was among the reasons it was necessary to topple Saddam Hussein.

A senior Iraqi intelligence official reportedly met with bin Laden in 1994 in Sudan, the panel found, and bin Laden "is said to have requested space to establish training camps, as well as assistance in procuring weapons, but Iraq apparently never responded."

" There have been reports that contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda also occurred after bin Laden had returned to Afghanistan, but they do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship " the report said. " Two senior Bin Laden associates have adamantly denied that any ties existed between al-Qaeda and Iraq. "

As recently as Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney asserted that Saddam had "long-established ties" with the terrorist network.

In making the case for war in Iraq, Bush administration officials frequently cited what they said were Saddam's decade-long contacts with al-Qaeda operatives. They stopped short of claiming that Iraq was directly involved in the Sept. 11 attacks but critics say Bush officials left that impression with the American public.

I think that is pretty clear.


posted by knn
  

Newsweek says the same: Bush's reasons for war have no basis



Quote:
This week the 9-11 commissioners find themselves engaged in another testy dispute, especially with Cheney, over the ties between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. For the Bush team, making the case that Saddam and bin Laden were linked is one of its most sensitive credibility issues, a key justification for following its assault on Al Qaeda with a much costlier and bloodier war in Iraq. The vice president insisted in short-tempered public remarks last week that the commission had agreed the Iraq-Qaeda links were extensive. But commission vice chair Hamilton acknowledged to NEWSWEEK the commissioners had differences with the administration. "We didn't have any evidence of collaboration or cooperation," Hamilton said flatly . He added that bin Laden's ties "to Iran and Pakistan were certainly stronger than any tie he had to Iraq." Despite Cheney's comments, Bartlett said the White House did not officially raise any questions about the report's conclusions on Qaeda-Iraq ties .



posted by knn
  





Reply to topic






RegisterRegister
Log inLog in
The time now is 1 December 2008, 22:43
php B.B.