»America is really sorry«
|
|||
   Quote: Some of us — hopefully most of us — are trying to understand and appreciate the effect our recent election will have on you, the citizens of the rest of the world. As our so-called leaders redouble their efforts to screw you over, please remember that some of us — hopefully most of us — are truly, truly sorry. And we'll say we're sorry, even on the behalf of the ones who aren't. posted by Crossfade |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsPolitics and Crime (Assorted topics)America is really sorry |
|
|||
 Yeah, they featured this website on CNN. It's worldfamous now [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Sorry for killing those who wish to kill us? That site almost made me sick... Numerous signs said sorry please don't' blow us up. What the fuck is that? IF kerry would have been elected the terrorist wouldn't hate us anymore? BULLSHIT, he said he would fight terrorists just as hard. Morons Terrorists have attacked us BEFORE Bush came into office. They didn't plan 9/11 because they dislike Bush. Bush is killing terrorists after the attack, what did Clinton do after the attack? NOTHING If Bush supporters need to wake up(which some undenyingly do) then these hippies need to do the same. I bet the torture victims and other senseless atrocities carried out by saddam and terrorist throughout the years aren't sorry.  [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 The ONEder Man: Numerous signs said sorry please don't' blow us up.
What the fuck is that? IF kerry would have been elected the terrorist wouldn't hate us anymore? No, the world would hate the US less and chances for a real coalition were higher, thus attacks less likely. The ONEder Man: Bush is killing terrorists after the attack, what did Clinton do after the attack? NOTHING Uff. How often do I have to debunk that? posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: No, the world would hate the US less and chances for a real coalition were higher, thus attacks less likely. higher? how? france? germany? russia? not gonna help...your talking bout the iraq coalition right? oh wait there were only 5 more nations in the coalition in the Gulf War...why no support then either? i hope your talking about the iraq coalition because the war on terror coalition is quite strong ps how is a better coalition in iraq make an attack less likely? knn: Uff. How often do I have to debunk that? i'm still waiting for you to  IMO → If kerry wins i garuntee you that the US will be attcked#19377
posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 that's right, these dumb people don't know jack, seriously get a real job losers, see how the world really is. posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Define real job?  Do you just mean like a doctor or lawyer? Cus that'd mean ALOT of people are working FAKE jobs then!
I dunno, the whole Iraq war situation is so sketchy, I mean it wasn't really provoked as much as 9/11 was! I mean you're gonna attack a country if they kill a few thousand innocents (that means America's still got a high potential of being attacked) but Iraq was on a sketchy claim that never really got proved! I mean I wouldn't have minded much if he would've just said "this man is a tyrant who kills his own people, he must be stopped!" So then the troops were in Iraq, they couldn't just be TAKEN out, it'd have unknown effects! Changing Bush would have unknown effects! Such things require a huge amount of research and thought and just conforming with the rest of the hippies and saying "Bush sucks" isnt really gonna accomplish much! posted by hungarian kid |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 The ONEder Man: oh wait there were only 5 more nations in the coalition in the Gulf War... Uff, not again. That has been debunked already. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 knn: Uff, not again. That has been debunked already. imo link? posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Quote: Changing Bush would have unknown effects! Such things require a huge amount of research and thought and just conforming with the rest of the hippies and saying "Bush sucks" isnt really gonna accomplish much! I agree 100%...alot of people are mislead by the media now a days and the only people that know what is going on there are the people there and the people who get the intel like the government. Changing the president would of probobly screwed so much stuff up its not worth talkign about. posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 The ONEder Man: imo link? IMO → Comparison of Iraq War Coalition #1 and #2 posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Agent zero: [quote= a lot of people are mislead by the media [/quote] But of course Bush supporters like you are not 
posted by Kupov |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Agent Zero: a lot of people are mislead by the media he may have a point. they aren't necessarily mislead, but most of the media is liberal, so they are guided. as for me, i'm "bushie." so that america is sorry thing,  . agree with onder man. kerry would've still attacked iraq. knn is going into the coalition stuff, but the main point i stil would say is iraq.
the iraq war...eh. kinda like hk on this one. i see a need to eliminate terrorists and saddam and osama. that's all. posted by sangu |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 The ONEder Man: Sorry for killing those who wish to kill us?
That site almost made me sick... Numerous signs said sorry please don't' blow us up. What the fuck is that? IF kerry would have been elected the terrorist wouldn't hate us anymore? BULLSHIT, he said he would fight terrorists just as hard. Morons Terrorists have attacked us BEFORE Bush came into office. They didn't plan 9/11 because they dislike Bush. Bush is killing terrorists after the attack, what did Clinton do after the attack? NOTHING If Bush supporters need to wake up(which some undenyingly do) then these hippies need to do the same. I bet the torture victims and other senseless atrocities carried out by saddam and terrorist throughout the years aren't sorry. What? "Killing those that wanted to kill us" Is that Saddam Hussain? posted by Pawnatron |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
 Pawnatron: What? "Killing those that wanted to kill us"
Is that Saddam Hussain? um... no where does it say they are refering to the iraqi people to not blow us up. i just assumed the writings were about al qaeda since it was osama's little group that organized 9/11, hince the first blowing up they are afraid of and like little cowards begging to not be blow up again... like voting for kerry would make the terrorists hate us less...get a clue america! how fuckin dumb are we these days? oh and saddam wouldn't have attacked us if he had the chance? lets ask him... posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
1, 2 Next
Goto page
1, 2 Next
 Register Log in |
The time now is 23 May 2012, 08:16 php B.B. |