»Is homosexuality immoral?«

That could be used to repress any social, political, or racial group.

The Bible gives us a traditional morality.

Why should we accept the traditional morality?

Because it is written in the Bible.

But I am sick of people like stinkz who judge others because of stupid primitive belief systems.

And intolerance, which is almost exclusively based on ignorance, is the one poison that has caused a hell of a lot of misery in the past. There should be no rule but one: do not harm others.

But I think that people like him are dangerous. It is not a far step from false information to intolerant behaviour, and not a far step from intolerant behaviour to outright violence

He even quotes the Nazi empire, whose views he defends unknowingly.

What the Nazi's were doing was stepping outside the bounds of Traditional Morality and forming their own partial morality. For instance, they redefined "Justice" as "what is in the interest of the Third Reich." Their problem was, in fact, much like your own.

In other words: What you describe as "partial morality" could have become the "standard morality" and we would live now in a world with "Germania" as the global capital city.

Your term "partial morality" vs "traditional morality" can only be applied by you now because of Hitler's "mistakes".

However, that does not change the fact that IF the government prohibited homosexuality, it would be doing homosexuals good.

There are many things that people claim the government could prohibit "for the good of others". That doesn't mean it would be moral for the government to do so.

So it wouldn't be good for homosexuals. It would be good for you.

If we are talking about moral goodness, then it will be good for homosexuals as well.

Well, off to a bad start. The Bible doesn't "give us" traditional morality. It is merely a part of it.
Wrong again. We should accept traditional morality because, without it, we have no basis for a belief in rational morality at all.

Nowhere have I stated either of your two "proofs" of my logical circle. Your method of argument is insane. You tell me what I believe, then blame me for believing it. THAT is far more circular than anything I have said.

And it's immoral because the Bible says so, and the Bible is right because the Bible says so.

I think we've been through this circle a few dozen times. Is there anything else to back up your claim besides "the Bible says so and the Bible is right"? Otherwise, I'm outta here.

but you haven't told me what traditional morality is based on.

The basis of morality is that it produces positive naturalistic results eg. less suffering, less death/more happy life.

Step outside humanity and form your own morality based upon nothing except what you've been taught by society, and what your admittedly corrupt conscience tells you.

How the hell can a care for people's wellbeing be "the basis of tyranny"? That is the most stupid thing I've ever heard!