|
|||
|
Marl64: Every once in a while, someone turns up a WWII shell or mine or whatever.
This doesn't mean we're stockpiling them. Or does it? *rubs hands* posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsBush, Kerry, IraqLiberal Propaganda scares me |
|
|||
|
channel four is obviously left-wing. I can see it with ease. and your country is consertive when it comes to the government. i really don't have a problem with it like that. hope it stays like that for a long time. might be good for you people! posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hungarian kid, way to go, you said some really good stuff. Anomaly as always bravo. I remember hearing about france, russia, china and others vested interest in iraq oil as being the major reason they didn't want war. The media didn't want to report that though. They were the only ones fighting the war and only because of oil. Well, france probably didn't want to get invaded again... but other than that, they were the ones with oil to gain, or lose. posted by liberal slayer |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agent Zero: channel four is obviously left-wing. I can see it with ease. and your country is consertive when it comes to the government. i really don't have a problem with it like that. hope it stays like that for a long time. might be good for you people! You watch channel four? What makes you say that it is left wing? - I found it pretty balanced. Liberal Slayer - strangely enough we don't write in the hope of receiving your praise. No one gives a sh*t whether you like what they say or not. The British media was quite keen to report that France and other European countries had oil deals in Iraq. Maybe your media information was one sided, but in Britain we have very good balanced reporting. posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
channel 4 is defently one sided...far left sided vewry far...like far far left. posted by Agent Zero |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is the british channel 4 right? The channel that owns the FilmFour company and all that? posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
let me get this right sarin nerve gas shell that iraq said they didn't have turn up but its not evidence of weapons of mass destruction given that 1 shell could kill hundreds or even thousands of people and channel 4 isnt left wing its official Elvis has left the building posted by the anomaly |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
labour are right wing these guys would disagree wsws.org... posted by the anomaly |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
(guess what the F stands for) Gas shells do not count as weapons of mass destruction! BTW Labour are still more left wing than the conservatives. Besides you can get right wing socialists. posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
were also in world war 1 but they werent sarin gas...the most deadly nerve agent on the planet if you don't consider a chemical weapon warhead/shell a weapon of mass destruction then what do you consider a weapon of mass destruction? as for right wing socialists...yeah...NATIONAL socialists posted by the anomaly |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
the anomaly: as for right wing socialists...yeah...NATIONAL socialists Yeah, I'd been trying to be subtle... posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
remember...there are people in here that only "get" things when you cuff them about the head with things you know who im talking about so perhaps its best not to be too subtle posted by the anomaly |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
no proof of stockpiling thing. We already knew that they used to have WMDs. What we didn't know is whether they had destroyed them or were still stockpiling them. It would be extremely surprising not to find any weapons even if they definitely weren't stockpiling any. They used to have tons - what do you think they did with all the imported anthrax? It seems very likely that those soldiers didn't know what they had. Since it is only one shell, it is not evidence of stockpiling. Have you seen the other thread about the director of the CIA? posted by fatpie42 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't get jealous because no one cares what you have to say. Stop being a whinny bitch. Channel 4 in America is completely different from the UK. Channel 4 in different parts of america is completely different from other channel 4s. Stop arguing about this. Socialists are by american standards as left wing as you can get. That's what left wingers are measured against. They are so because they stand for complete government control, where in everyone shares mentality. Liberals are like this, only not quite as extreme. As far as stuff in England goes, I have no idea about your labor stuff and how right and left winged stuff works there. Please explain anomaly. posted by liberal slayer |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
the UN said..."you have weapons of mass destruction...let in our inspectors and we wnt bomb you" iraq said..."fuck off gay boys...stick your weapons inspectors up your ass" american said..."you have weapons of mass destruction...get rid of them or we bomb you back to the stone age" iraq said..."we don't have have weapons of mass destruction...fuck off gay boy" america said..."*wisper wisper...right...bomb em" america went in and found mustard gas and sarin shells the media still say..."no weapons of blah bush is bad blah...vote for kerry blah" oh...and saddam ordered the use of chemical weapons he said he didn't have...funny that but our media believes the regime that pumps out "facts" from good ole "comical ali" posted by the anomaly |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 9 January 2009, 20:46 php B.B. |