|
|||
|
Pawnatron: It's like saying "Killing a man is like stealing a car", and then you say "Well no, killing a man is a much worse crime". But what I ment was it's just as illegal. But it's not "just as illegal". Pawnatron: Saying prieses are gay influenced is just as stupid as saying all germans are Nazis. But it's not "as stupid". Saying priests are gay influenced is similar to say that Germans are Nazi influenced. Which they probably are. posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgReligion and Mysteries, from worship to werewolvesReligious & Philosophical TopicsThe Christian cult: Under gay influence? |
|
|||
|
knn: Pawnatron: It's like saying "Killing a man is like stealing a car", and then you say "Well no, killing a man is a much worse crime". But what I ment was it's just as illegal. But it's not "just as illegal". Pawnatron: Saying prieses are gay influenced is just as stupid as saying all germans are Nazis. But it's not "as stupid". Saying priests are gay influenced is similar to say that Germans are Nazi influenced. Which they probably are. What? In what way is killing a man "More illegal" ? Just because the crime is worse and the punishment is harder it's still just AS much illegal... it's like saying "My name is James" "My name is also James" "Yeah well, my name is more James than you" "But it's the same name" "Yeah my name is more" Stealing 10$ is just as illegal as stealing 100000000000000$" Sure 1000000000000$ is more money but in both cases you are doing something illegal...and something illegal cant be more illegal than something else... I have explained this on an Icelandic forum before, and it took the guy quite some time to get this...please don't be that guy... "I am a user on IMO" "I am IMO user more than you" ? posted by Pawnatron |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
And yes still. Saying that priestes are gay influenced is just as stupid as saying that all Germans are Nazis. It's not because it is a simular statement or like "Catholic pristes do this and that that looks guy" and "during the war german people bla bla Hitler, swastika bla bla" If we culd put statements in different Genres of statements i'm not saying they would go in the same. But if we take all the statements in the world and put them in a "Stupid" "Not stupid"..."box"...then they would all go in the "Stupid" box... Just like two boxes..."Legal" and "Illegal", you cant have "More illegal" and "Less illegal", you just have to take what's illegal and then what is not illegal. Therefore everything that is illegal is just as illegal as other stuff that is illegal. Pawnatron: Two straws (Stealing 1$) are just as many as two huge rocks (Killing a man) Knn: No, that's not the same, the rocks are much bigger then straws, the straws are small See, there's my point...please tell me you understand? posted by Pawnatron |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why does every contentious issue always come down to someone making an analogy to Hitler or Nazis? Hitler must be god, because he is the one who always settles debates. posted by MindSlave |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
h_o_h: Why does every contentious issue always come down to someone making an analogy to Hitler or Nazis? Godwin's Law ♣. posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
MindSlave: Why does every contentious issue always come down to someone making an analogy to Hitler or Nazis? Hitler must be god, because he is the one who always settles debates. Ehhh...he's just something VERY extreme and when explaining something to someone taking something extreme as an example always makes the explanation a bit more simple... because the example is so extreme. Or I think that's the reason...it's my reason. posted by Pawnatron |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 10 January 2009, 00:14 php B.B. |