|
|||
|
Tiefling: Sex spreads AIDS! It doesn't matter what kind. Well, mostly gay sex spreads AIDS. AIDS _IS_ an illness of gays. Heterosexuals practically never get AIDS (because they don't have sex with gays). And they hardly spread AIDS. (There is actually another way to infect someone with HIV, and that is from mother->embryo. But that's a side note) I have the feeling that all the talk about "it's the virus' fault, everyone can get it" is a media hysteria. The statistics that I have cited prove otherwise: AIDS = premature death for gays. (Except in Africa, but that has been mentioned above). posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgTechnology, Computers, Science, InternetScience (Assorted topics)Homosexuality spreads AIDS, heterosexuality not really |
|
|||
|
I was flabbergasted when I noticed how vividly gays try to convince everyone that ANYONE can get AIDS. And that it has NOTHING to do with the way of life (promiscuity, drugs,...) but that it has everything to do with viruses. It seemed, it was just a case of non-responsibility (because if it's a virus and not your own behaviour, then you can't do anything against it). They got really angry, when someone proposed this may have to do with poppers. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this, or is this not, a true statement? Heterosexuals spread AIDS. posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: ANYONE can get AIDS You do realize that they're right, don't you? That anyone who is having sex can get AIDS? posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tiefling: Is this, or is this not, a true statement?
Heterosexuals spread AIDS. In 99% of cases this is untrue. In 1% it is true. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol. proof? posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tiefling: lol. proof? The proof is that in 99% of the cases where HIV is spread by sex, it's gay sex. The proof is also, that only gays (and a small % of hemophiliacs and drug addicts) get AIDS, as shown by the statistics I posted. But maybe you mean something else: Maybe you don't mean the statistical average of how AIDS _IS_ spread but how likely AIDS spreads from 1 person to another in HYPOTHETICAL circumstances. Then, yes you are right: If you take 2 heterosexuals, who engage in anal sex while taking poppers and having 200+ sex partners per month... then yes, such a persons would infect others as likely as gay persons. I don't think that AIDS attacks gay persons because they are gay. And if you don't believe me: I think there is NOT A SINGLE DOCUMENTED CASE where a heterosexual has spread AIDS to another heterosexual person who then spreads it to another. A -> B Yup, documented A -> B -> C Nope posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are 34 million persons worldwide infected with HIV, including one million children. An estimated 5.6 million new infections occurred in 1999, of which 95% were in developing nations. Most new infections are heterosexually transmitted, and about half are among women. Without condoms, heterosexual transmission continues to soar. Consider this. In some African nations, 1 in 3 adults are infected with HIV. Unprotected sexual contact is common, making transmission more likely and more widespread. Although we clearly don't like discussing it here, the entire heterosexual continent of Africa is suffering and AIDS epidemic, which has nothing to do with homosexuality or anal sex. Perhaps if they would just try to be white, it wouldn't be a problem. Make the gays straight, make the blacks white, and we'd all be comfortable then, wouldn't we? Perhaps if people like you quit calling it a "homosexual disease" then straight people would consider it before making their own sexual choices. posted by Dark Star |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: I think there is NOT A SINGLE DOCUMENTED CASE where a heterosexual has spread AIDS to another heterosexual person who then spreads it to another. Wow. You need some AIDS education, sir. posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
You do realize that AIDS transmission is all about the exchange of bodily fluids and has nothing to do with the anus being a "dirty" place, right? posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the West, the original source of AIDS was homosexuals. Who knows where they got it. Beastiality maybe? posted by stinkz |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dark Star: "There are 34 million persons worldwide infected with HIV, including one million children. An estimated 5.6 million new infections occurred in 1999, of which 95% were in developing nations. Most new infections are heterosexually transmitted, and about half are among women." Dark Star: Although we clearly don't like discussing it here, the entire heterosexual continent of Africa is suffering and AIDS epidemic, which has nothing to do with homosexuality or anal sex. Perhaps if they would just try to be white, it wouldn't be a problem. Make the gays straight, make the blacks white, and we'd all be comfortable then, wouldn't we?
Perhaps if people like you quit calling it a "homosexual disease" then straight people would consider it before making their own sexual choices. As I wrote above: Africa is a different thing. I am not talking about Africa in this thread here. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
stinkz: In the West, the original source of AIDS was homosexuals. Who knows where they got it. Beastiality maybe? Do you claim now that bestiality is something typical gay too? Because this thread is about homosex spreads sex more that heterosex. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Homosexuals have a greater chance of being involved with other perverse sexual behaviors, such as beastiality, yes. posted by stinkz |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
stinkz: Homosexuals have a greater chance of being involved with other perverse sexual behaviors, such as beastiality, yes. And do you have any statistics about the infection animal -> human? If there is no such infection, then I cannot see how your statement contributes to this thread. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 10 January 2009, 01:02 php B.B. |