In-My-Opinion.org

»Should someone who likes sex attack Christianity?«





As you know Christian Churches suppress sexuality (pornography, masturbation, homosexuality)

   
No, not really leave the Churches alone
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
Don't know / Don't care
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
Yes, we have the right to fight back by demanding that crucifixes be unmounted etc
30%
 30%  [ 6 ]
Number of users, who voted: 20
Number of counted votes: 20




Login first to vote.

As you know Christian Churches suppress sexuality (pornography, masturbation, homosexuality, ...).

Is it OK to repay with the same methods?
• The Churches try to forbid pornography -> let's forbid crosses in schools, let's forbid showing priests in TV
• The Churches try to suppress abortion -> let's allow brothels only in the direct neighbourhood of churches
• The Churches try to suppress certain practices -> let's teach "certain practices" in schools
• The Churches try to suppress sex on the streets (miniskirts, ...) -> let's forbid priests clothes and public masses
• The Churches try to forbid condoms -> let's force them to place condom ads in front of their church (similar to "smoking causes cancer" -> "sex without condoms causes unwanted pregnancies" or "Warning! This priest's advice may ruin your life")
• The Churches try to cut out nude scenes from movies -> let's present priests and Christians as idiots/evil in movies
• The Churches support "peeping out" bad words -> let's peep out any mention of "god", "jesus" and "lord"

... etc


posted by knn

in-my-opinion.org -> Religion and Mysteries, from worship to werewolves -> Religious & Philosophical Topics -> Should someone who likes sex attack Christianity?

Keep spewing hatred, knn...



Your rebellious attitude towards all forms of morality is quite childish.

posted by stinkz
  

Free of spew



stinkz:
Your rebellious attitude towards all forms of morality is quite childish.

I merely started a poll. Nothing more. You can't read my opinion about anything from that fact.

And please stop mixing Christianity with morality. Christianity is maybe completely immoral, and morality may be completely Christianity-free.

Moreover you are free to start polls YOU like.


posted by knn
  

I'm not biased, I swear!



knn:
You can't read my opinion about anything from that fact.

You're joking, right? You always claim to be unbiased, but one doesn't have to be a very keen observer to discover your opinions, knn. You make it blatantly obvious.
knn:
And please stop mixing Christianity with morality.

I can mix them if I please. Christ and morality and walk hand in hand.


posted by stinkz
  If popular thought feels 'science' to be different from all other kinds of knowledge because science is experimentally verifiable, it is mistaken.



knn:
The Churches try to forbid condoms

they do, really? are there some links for this?

anyway, God created a man and woman with hormones and all that. sex is meant for marriage not before. if it is for marriage, its all good.


posted by sangu
  

The following post has been deemed OFFTOPIC. Do not answer it and do not quote from it or from parts of it. The reporter (knn) said: "Offtopic"

No need to attack Christianity, snuggle with our Maxim host



You all seem pretty charged up, I think you'll enjoy our interview of the lovely Veronica Trollerud today...

AT 3, 7 & 10 PM TODAY on MAC AND SLATER.

ONLY AT


GUEST HOST: MAXIM MODEL VERONICA TROLLERUD. The lovely Veronica was the winner of the 2004 Coors Light Maxim Girl Search and her career has taken off. Unfortunately she can’t seem to find a man to satisfy her. Mac and Slater attempt to help on today’s show.

Mac will be in Vegas this weekend crowning the 2005 Coors Light Maxim Girl, with a panel of judges the likes of Terrell Owens, Michael Bay and Traci Bingham. Veronica is currently in Cancun on a shoot for MTV and Hawaiian Tropic. She’ll be guest hosting with us from her ocean villa, lounging in her bikini enjoying that utopian Cancun sunshine.

Mac and Slater.
It's not talk radio. It's fight radio.
Only at


posted by macandslater
  

Link for the anti-condom movement



sangu:
they do, really? are there some links for this?

"against condoms" 
condoms "george w. bush" 


posted by knn
  

Nasa sends pornographic smut into outer space



When Nasa wanted to send information about earth and human life into outer space (in case aliens would find it), angry Christians accused Nasa of sending "pornographic smut". See the picture in question and judge for yourself.

Part of the other information that Nasa sent were photographs of humans. But this anti-sexuality was also the reason that none of the picture showed any man with a woman in any social contact.

Since Christians influenced the decision of scientists: Do non-Christians have the right to fight back?

[CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE]


posted by knn
  

False assumption as basis for this poll



"As you know Christian Churches suppress sexuality (pornography, masturbation, homosexuality)"

No. As far as I know, Christianity considers sexuality to be holy, and because it is holy, it must be used only in a certain way at certain times.

posted by dub329
  

Nearly everything is unholy for them



dub329:
No. As far as I know, Christianity considers sexuality to be holy, and because it is holy, it must be used only in a certain way at certain times.

No, it's not holy for Christians. Only CERTAIN types of sexuality are holy.
• Must be unprotected (Catholics)
• Must be heterosexual (most Christian denominations)
• Must be within marriage
• ...

Anything else is unholy.


posted by knn
  

Define your terms



Quote:
No, it's not holy for Christians. Only CERTAIN types of sexuality are holy.

You just contradicted yourself. Your argument:

1) Some forms of sexuality are condemned
Therefore, all of sexuality is condemned/ "supressed"

hmm...

Perhaps I was vague. This might be more accurate:

As far as I know, the traditional Christian view of sexuality is that sexuality is holy, but it must be used in the right way at the right time. God gives us the ability to create life, which is holy. Misuse of something holy makes it no longer holy.


posted by dub329
  

Simply untrue



dub329:
You just contradicted yourself. Your argument:

1) Some forms of sexuality are condemned
Therefore, all of sexuality is condemned/ "supressed"

hmm...

No, YOU are contradicting yourself. Because you claim that sex is holy, but then you exclude certain types. Christians DO NOT view sexuality as holy. I can't remember any Christian denomination that thinks of anal sex as holy. Or oral sex. Only CERTAIN kinds of sexuality are holy: Intravaginal penetration that may lead to procreation. Anything else is seen as "aberration".

Thus please don't claim that Christians consider sexuality as holy. It's simply untrue.

Christians have to do a mind trick: "Sex is good, but anal sex is a perversion and not sex. Thus we can still claim that Sex is god given, since we don't see anal sex as bona fide sex".

It's like saying: "Taste is a godgiven holy pleasure, but eating pork is simply gross. Thus let's forbid pork, since it has nothing to do with taste."

Or: "Human life is holy, but Asians and Blacks are not humans, thus we have the moral right to kill them" or similar nonsense.


posted by knn
  

Don't split hairs



dub329:
You just contradicted yourself. Your argument:

1) Some forms of sexuality are condemned
Therefore, all of sexuality is condemned/ "supressed"

hmm...

Moreover you are splitting hairs here.

If I suppress certain types of art, say cubism and romanticism, then I _am_ suppressing art.

Did Hitler suppress humans? Of course he did, although he did not suppress _ALL_ of them.

I even mention the types of sexuality that Christians want to suppress in the poll question.


posted by knn
  

Catholic viewpoint



If forms of sexual behavior are forms of sex, then yes, Christianity limits sex. If the definition of sex must include a loving union and procreation, then no.

I am unsure what the "Christian" stance is. I doubt it is uniform with so many denominations.

posted by dub329
  



Note to readers: Yeahh I intended to give the Catholic reply to the Church's supression of homosexuality, but I am unsure what it is exactly. The subject line to my previous comment is thus misleading.

posted by dub329
  



Goto page
1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Reply to topic
Goto page
1, 2, 3, 4  Next






RegisterRegister
Log inLog in
The time now is 24 May 2012, 06:56
php B.B.