|
|||
|
A number of people have been killed in a series of explosions on London's transport system during this morning's rush hour, causing chaos in the British capital, police and transport officials said.
Several blasts hit the Underground network and police said there had been at least three explosions on buses in the city. A source at the Metronet consortium that runs part of the capital's Underground network said "there were three explosions and there have been some fatalities". Home Secretary Charles Clarke said the blasts had caused "terrible injuries" although he did not give specific figures. "I want to express sympathy on behalf of the whole government to the families and friends of those who have been injured," Mr Clarke told reporters outside Prime Minister Tony Blair's Downing Street residence. "The health services are in support to deal with the terrible injuries that there have been." The causes of the incidents, a day after London was awarded the 2012 Olympics and as leaders of the Group of Eight rich nations met in Scotland, were unknown but police said many of the city's Underground stations were affected. "It is too too early to state what has happened," a London police spokesman said. "I cannot comment on reports of bombs, but we have had multi-reports of explosions around London." Underground People were seen streaming out of one Underground station covered in blood and soot. Passengers were evacuated from stations across the capital, many in shock and with their clothes ripped to shreds, witnesses said. The entire system was shut down and major thoroughfares were blocked off by police and ambulance services. Bus blast One bus was blown up in Tavistock Square in central London, a policeman told Reuters. "There have been some casualties and this has been declared as a major incident," a spokeswoman for London's Metropolitan Police said. Virginia Crompton was close to the explosion on a double decker bus in Tavistock Square. "I decided given the scale of the chaos, it was best to walk to work and head towards town, I've just gone through Russel Square and turned onto Gordon Square where I heard a huge explosion very close by," she said. "I turned into Gordon Square Gardens which is where I am now and two men run past me who had witnessed what they said was a bus being blown up, they described the roof coming out and I said, 'do you think anyone was hurt' and they said 'yes, definitely'." Aldgate East station Emergency services rushed to the Aldgate East underground station where police reported the first incident at 8:59am local time. "There were people streaming out of Aldgate station covered in blood," 27-year-old Kate Heywood said, on her way to work. "There are shards of glass there, it is chaos," she said. A Reuters correspondent at Oxford Circus station, at the heart of the underground system, heard an announcement over the public-address system saying: "A power outage has occurred London-wide. All train services are suspended." A station official said: "All the power has gone down. I don't know when it'll come back." Steve Spence was travelling on one of the trains. "I was on an outer circle train - going from Paddington from Edgware Road ... there was a big flash, a loud bang and lots of smoke, and there was a train on the other track - it had stopped as well, lots of screaming," he said. "When we evacuated the train the front of my train was smashed up and there was lots of debris from the other train on the track." Police cordon Police sealed off large areas around other underground and mainline rail stations. Firemen donned chemical protection suits before rushing into stations. Half a dozen people dishevelled and with soot-blackened faces sat on the floor at Russell Square Underground station or stood in shock as police cordoned off the area and ambulances crews raced in, one witness said. The Great Eastern Hotel, which was hosting a conference on the Israeli economy, was evacuated. Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to attend the conference but had not arrived. The president of the European Parliament said that London had suffered a "coordinated series of attacks" and blamed terrorism for the blasts on public transport, which he said caused many deaths.
In a solemn statement to the assembly, which had interrupted its normal business, Josep Borrell said: "Reports have reached me of what now appears to be a coordinated series of attacks on London's transport system". "Explosions have been detonated on three buses and four tube stations and there are already confirmed deaths and terrible injuries on a lot of people," he said. "We have to deal with a lot of deaths." The EU legislature observed a minute's silence after Mr Borrell said: "We all stand with you today, British people, and we will never let atrocities or terrorism defeat the values of peace and democracy." The European Union's commissioner for justice and security affairs, Franco Frattini, also said the blasts that hit London's Underground and bus services were terrorist attacks. "We have the tragic confirmation that terrorism has once again hit the heart of Europe and hit a country that holds the presidency of the (European) Union and the G8," Mr Frattini told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in Rome. "What should we do? Activate immediately coordination between intelligence and police and offer the United Kingdom all the help it needs," he said. posted by hungarian kid |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsPolitics and Crime (Assorted topics)Terrorist attack in the middle of London |
|
|||
|
Let's not forget that it's an attack on the country that went to war against the Iraq. After the attacks in the US, Spain, UK maybe Italy or Poland is next? Since George W. Bush called Iran "evil" Iranians elected a hardliner as the new Iranian President. He is suspected to be one of the terrorists who kidnapped USAnians. So let's see what support terrorists will get from Iran's country leader. Since George W. Bush established a Terrorist Training Center (= Iraq) maybe such attacks will become stronger and stronger. More info at IMO → Iraq turned into a terrorists breeding ground posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
i know i sound really naive for saying this but, i honestly didn't think they would target london...i don't know why. i just came from there and i have friends that i left behind so ive been trying to get in touch with them. you cant go anywhere anymore its so crap. posted by gkiss |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
gkiss: you cant go anywhere anymore its so crap. I don't think they would attack Canada. Or smaller villages in the US. Terrorists LOVE capital cities. They LOVE to let things explode and then watch on CNN how emergency personell runs around. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: Since George W. Bush called Iran "evil" Iranians elected a hardliner as the new Iranian President. He is suspected to be one of the terrorists who kidnapped USAnians. So let's see what support terrorists will get from Iran's country leader. Uh...I think those people are fooling themselves if they think that guy - the new Iranian president - was involved in the Iranian hostage situation. Trauma can do that, make people believe strange things. posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: I don't think they would attack Canada Of couse not...because we are so awesome knn: Terrorists LOVE capital cities. They LOVE to let things explode and then watch on CNN how emergency personell runs around. Well of course how else would they make their point so strongly. That was one of the funniest scenes in Farenheit 911 when Michael Moore was asking the small towns people if they were worried about a terrorist attack and they were scared the terrorists would hit their spaghetti place or destroy their wallmart. posted by Kupov |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: I don't think they would attack Canada. Or smaller villages in the US i pray that i don't regret saying this but im so glad i live in toronto and if the reason why they are going after these places is because of their involvement in the war then im so glad that canada decided not to participate. but who knows? i could be wrong posted by gkiss |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
I doubt these guys would ever attack Iceland... even though we were on that list of nations that supported the war... So I feel pretty safe... But isn't it a possibility that IRA did this? posted by Pawnatron |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pawnatron: I doubt these guys would ever attack Iceland...
even though we were on that list of nations that supported the war... So I feel pretty safe... But isn't it a possibility that IRA did this? It's all speculation... And knn changed the thread title... posted by hungarian kid |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pawnatron: I doubt these guys would ever attack Iceland...
even though we were on that list of nations that supported the war... So I feel pretty safe... But isn't it a possibility that IRA did this? Well, that's technically a possibility but I doubt it...just because relations have improved between Ireland and the UK, and the only real Irish terrorists now are on the fringes, and probably not able to execute such a concerted attack... posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
gkiss: you cant go anywhere anymore its so crap. I know this is a common sentiment, but why do you say that? 2 Buildings in the US, a rail system in Spain and now subway areas and a bus in the UK. Hardly constitutes less than 1% of these country area. i.e. Most people were not in the two towers, most people were not on the rail system, most people were not in the subway. Fear of the possible is what crushes economy and saftey and security. I mean, two buildings come down in New York and then that means it hard to find a Computer Science job afterwards? The terrorist act is not the threat so much in the long run, it's our response to it. Spain seems to have handled their attack better than us and I think the UK will as well. Of course their attacks where as "destructive" as ours, but still. posted by volonteshiva |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
volonteshiva: The terrorist act is not the threat so much in the long run, it's our response to it. Spain seems to have handled their attack better than us and I think the UK will as well. I agree with this totally, especially if you consider the vengeance factor that came into play with the way Iraq was handled by the US... posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote: gkiss:you cant go anywhere anymore its so crap. I hear this often, and it always reminds me of the stories my grandparents tell me about the good old days. I'm not really sure when the good old days were when it was safe for one to go everywhere or anywhere for that matter. An attack on underground public transportation is not anything new, and especially not for a major European city. In July of 1995 in Paris, France the Place Saint-Michel 'B' line station was bombed by terrorist killing 11 (or so) people and injuring no less than 100. This was 10 years ago, and only one of the several attacks Paris suffered that summer. I was in Nancy, France at the time of this particular attack and I was appalled, and shocked never having witnessed anything of the sort. Now I realize I was just naive about terroist attacks that happen around the world. I completely agree with Volonteshiva in that these attacks are only a small percentage of these countries' area, and people should not allow these attacks to scare them into a modified lifestyle. If for no other reason than that is exactly the response desired by the attackers. I honestly am in more fear for my life, and justly so, driving down any major interstate in the U.S. than I am of dying in a terrorist attack anywhere in the world. posted by Laraimaem |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Welcome to IMO posted by Kupov |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Laraimaem: I completely agree with Volonteshiva in that these attacks are only a small percentage of these countries' area, and people should not allow these attacks to scare them into a modified lifestyle. If for no other reason than that is exactly the response desired by the attackers. I honestly am in more fear for my life, and justly so, driving down any major interstate in the U.S. than I am of dying in a terrorist attack anywhere in the world. you guys are right, i totally agree with you on that. i have travelled all over before and after any attacks on whatever country at any time and will continue to travel as much as i possibly can. nothing at all will ever scare me away from that i think its a widely held sentiment because if you think about it...these are people, ordinary people who just woke up in the morning and got ready to go to work or school or wherever, just like they do any other day without a second thought. and then when your sitting on the subway reading the newspaper waiting for your next stop to come up all of a sudden everything is turned upside down and your either dead or half dead and you don't know what hit you. this is what i meant: its the instilled feeling in most of us that any decision you take on a daily basis becomes a complete risk...not just because of these "terrorists" or not just since sept 11th...the risk has just become so much more substantial after these events. maybe i just said that because of the shock of what happened and the anger and frustration i feel when innocent lives are taken and/or drastically altered with the snap of a finger without warning. it just puts things into perspective...i don't know, what do you guys think? posted by gkiss |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 24 May 2012, 16:51 php B.B. |