|
|||
|
1 Q. Is Marijuana Addictive?
A. No, it is not Most users are moderate consumers who smoke it socially to relax. We now know that 10% of our population have "addictive personalities" and they are neither more nor less likely to overindulge in cannabis than in anything else. On a relative scale, marijuana is less habit forming than either sugar or chocolate but more so than anchovies. Sociologists report a general pattern of marijuana use that peaks in the early adult years, followed by a period of levelling off and then a gradual reduction in use 1 Q. Has Anyone Ever Died From Smoking Marijuana? A. No; not one single case, not ever. THC is one of the few chemicals for which there is no known toxic amount [10]. The federal agency NIDA says that autopsies reveal that 75 people per year are high on marijuana when they die: this does not mean that marijuana caused or was even a factor in their deaths. The chart below compares the number of deaths attributable to selected substances in a typical year: Tobacco...340,000 - 395,000 Alcohol (excluding crime/accidents)...125,000+ Drug Overdose (prescription)...24,000 - 27,000 Drug Overdose (illegal)...3,800 - 5,200 Marijuana... ...0 *Source: U.S. Government Bureau of Mortality Statistics, 1987 3 Q. Does Marijuana Lead to Crime and/or Hard Drugs? A. No [11]. The only crime most marijuana users commit is that they use marijuana. And, while many people who abuse dangerous drugs also smoke marijuana, the old "stepping stone" theory is now discredited, since virtually all of them started out "using" legal drugs like sugar, coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, etc. 4 Q. Does Marijuana Make People Violent? A. No. In fact, Federal Bureau of Narcotics director Harry Anslinger once told Congress just the opposite - that it leads to non-violence and pacifism [12]. If he was telling the truth (which he and key federal agencies have not often done regarding marijuana), then re-legalizing marijuana should be considered as one way to curb violence in our cities. The simple fact is that marijuana does not change your basic personality. The government says that over 20 million Americans still smoke it, probably including some of the nicest people you know. 5 Q. How Does Marijuana Affect Your Health? A. Smoking anything is not healthy, but marijuana is less dangerous than tobacco and people smoke less of it at a time. This health risk can be avoided by eating the plant instead of smoking it [13], or can be reduced by smoking smaller amounts of stronger marijuana. There is no proof that marijuana causes serious health or sexual problems [14] but, like alcohol, its use by children or adolescents is discouraged. Cannabis is a medicinal herb that has hundreds of proven, valuable theraputic uses - from stress reduction to glaucoma to asthma to cancer therapy, etc. [15]. 6 Q. What About All Those Scary Statistics and Studies? A. Most were prepared as scare tactics for the government by Dr. Gabriel Nahas, and were so biased and unscientific that Nahas was fired by the National Institute of Health [16] and finally renounced his own studies as meaningless [17]. For one experiment, he suffocated monkeys for five minutes at a time, using proportionately more smoke than the average user inhales in an entire lifetime [18]. The other studies that claim sensational health risks are also suspect, since they lack controls and produce results which cannot be replicated or independently verified [19]. 7 Q. What Can I Do About Marijuana? A. No independent government panel that has studied marijuana has ever recommended jail for users [20]. Concerned persons should therefore ask their legislators to re-legalize and tax this plant, subject to age limits and regulations similar to those on alcohol and tobacco. posted by Kupov |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgGirls and Boys, Body & Health, Food & Diet, Home & GardenDiets, Medicine, Food, Body, Workout, Sexuality6 things about marijuanna |
|
|||
|
Marijuanna may be less dangerous than alcohol or less unhealthy than tobacco, but it may only mean that they should forbid alcohol and tobacco instead of allowing marijuanna. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just because you have fun being sober, doesn't mean I do... Everything is bad for you to some degree. But if you took away everything that is semi-dangerous for you, we wouldn't be able to watch TV(radiation), use a computer(same reason), clean water(chlorine is bad for you), sex(you can get an STD or cervical cancer(for women)), masturbation(your hands can get dry), driving a car(exhaust), going outside on warm, sunny days(skin cancer)... The list goes on. posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, you list only some things dangerous for the body, but not things that make you more stupid. Drugs are dangerous because they make you more stupid. That they destroy your body is fine, I don't care. But stupid people cause much more problems than people with weak bodies. Does anyone care whether the Russian president has pains when peeing? No. Does anyone care whether he mentions pressing the red button while under alcohol? Yes. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: Does anyone care whether the Russian president has pains when peeing? No.
Does anyone care whether he mentions pressing the red button while under alcohol? Yes. Oh now we're getting into international law! I'll support your position when all the more immediate threats to international security are eliminated: totalitarian regimes, crime syndicates, and terror organizations. When that's all gone, we can get into banning substances. I also wonder how you can enforce a ban on something so ancient as hemp! It's not like some designer drug where only a few people with chemistry degrees know how to make it...I can't tell you how many apartments I have been to where you can see the telltale light coming out from under the closet door, indicating that pot is growing there. If someone in a country with drug laws as strictly enforced as the US can grow pot in their apartment, you can forget about enforcing a ban effectively in rural and undeveloped countries where there is a more massive organized crime presence than here. Get real knn! posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
holy_of_holies: Oh now we're getting into international law! I'll support your position when all the more immediate threats to international security are eliminated: totalitarian regimes, crime syndicates, and terror organizations. When that's all gone, we can get into banning substances. Yes, ONLY AFTER organized crime is eliminated we can go after rape and it-and-run offences. Spare us such cheap populistic tricks. These issues are not very realted and have to be addressed independently. holy_of_holies: I also wonder how you can enforce a ban on something so ancient as hemp! It's not like some designer drug where only a few people with chemistry degrees know how to make it...I can't tell you how many apartments I have been to where you can see the telltale light coming out from under the closet door, indicating that pot is growing there. If someone in a country with drug laws as strictly enforced as the US can grow pot in their apartment, you can forget about enforcing a ban effectively in rural and undeveloped countries where there is a more massive organized crime presence than here. Offtopic. This thread is not about anti-drug measures. It's worth a new thread though. I have started IMO → How can a government fight drug use (= enforce prohibition)? holy_of_holies: Get real knn! posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
It affects short-term memory... But I have never heard of it lowering IQs or anything of that nature. I'll let that one slide and assume you meant short-term memory, KNN, you should know this... If you're going to argue, don't use generalizations. posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe your statement concerning the russian president was a little misdirected. You see, that statement is concerning modes of use... Like DWI vs. drinking and staying home. I am all for DWI, fuck drunk drivers, or anyone who wants to drive under the influence of any drug for that matter. But does that mean I believe someone who sits at home and has a beer shouldn't have that right? No. But of course, you could always raise the issue of instead of prohibiting the use of drugs(marijuana, alcohol, caffiene, tylenol, you name it), shouldn't we prohibit red buttons? posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Evil Elvis Bush: It affects short-term memory... But I have never heard of it lowering IQs or anything of that nature. There are simply no studies that I know of that screen neurocognitive performance over time comparing pot smokers before they started to smoke and 10 years after they smoke. But that doesn't mean there are no such effects. However, the point is, once you allow pot, other drugs sneak in. Actually for me it makes not much sense to allow alcohol or cigarettes but disallow pot. There is a misrealtion between the negative effect of pot and the public outcry. If a government would be consequent, they'd either abolish alcohol or allow pot. At least at home. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Evil Elvis Bush: I believe your statement concerning the russian president was a little misdirected. I believe knn's point was that you allow something like Evil Elvis Bush: someone who sits at home and has a beer then knn: Does anyone care whether he mentions pressing the red button while under alcohol? Yes. is a highly possible reality. If you allow something, then all the negatives associated with it are possible unless you have computerised personal policing in a totalitarian 1984-type state or something On a related note.. IMO → Here is my beef with the new supreme court desision on pot! IMO → How can a government fight drug use (= enforce prohibition)? Why don't you register, "Evil Elvis Bush" ? posted by ryder |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
ryder: is a highly possible reality. It's not only possible. It is (at least was) the reality in the Kreml. Gorbatshov forbid alcohol in the Kreml. Before Gorbatshow, the leaders of the country came drunk to work. And it actually continued with Yeltsin, as you may remember his drunk perfomances in the public. Actually there was one case where he visited another country, his airplane landed, the greeting delegation was standing on the runway and his bodyguard (inside of the plane) didn't let Yeltsin out because he was completely under drugs. Country leaders under drugs are criminals. Hitler was under drugs too. He had cocaine and a lot of other drugs in his blood (drug cocktail). John F. Kennedy also took drugs and nearly started an atom war with Russia, whose leader were also drugged. See also IMO → George W. Bush is on psycho-drugs (strong anti-depressants) posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q:Why don't I register? A: I just haven't gotten around to it yet, I will, no doubt. Just because Hitler had drugs in his system, automatically drugs cause violent/nazi-like behavior? I've never smoked a joint and thought... "Let's kill a whole race." The only drugs I can see causing violent behavior would be cocaine/amphedimenes(I know I didn't spell it right, give me an effin' break!), but then by those standards caffiene is just as dangerous as it causes similar effects. But Knn, we are not talking about alcohol or cocaine or even PCP for that matter.. This thread is regarding Marijuana. Now if you look at societies where Marijuana is legalized, Holland, British Coloumbia... You will find a very low(not non-existent, but certainly lower than the US and other countries which treat Marijuana as a n illegal drug), explain that. Now, as for other drugs sneaking in... Well one could say they already do. But even in societies where Marijuana is legal, there are still drug addicts... Heroin is one that comes to mind. However, because of the gov'ts stance on drugs in that particular part of the world... Drug addicts are treated like sick people, not criminals. I am not for the legalization of heroin, cocaine, or any other opiate-based drug or narcotic for that matter. But Marijuana exists within the realm of Halluncinogens and these my friend have been in use for thousands of years and don't really pose any real threat to us(I'm not talking LSD, this is man-made=more intense than it should be, bad, can cause severe brain-damage)... Now, to make my final statement... I'll steal a quote from the late Bill Hicks... "See I think drugs have done some good things for us, I really do... And if you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, do me a favor. Go home tonight, take all your albums, all your cds, all your tapes and burn... Cause you know what, the musicians that made all that great music that has enhanced your life throughout the years. Real fucking high on drugs." But on a serious note, I personally believe marijuana has helped me... See I used to suffer from almost extreme public anxiety(I don't know if this a real term, but anyways), I had difficulty meeting and talking to new people. Well, when I first smoked marijuana I was 18, a few months before highschool graduation and for the first few months, everytime I smoked I became extremely paranoid(be reminded that a marijuana high to someone who is inexperienced with any drugs can be very intense), strange things... Like I would wonder if I would say horrible things out loud and not remember doing it and I remember one time, I was afraid I had dropped drow infront of a big group of people. Anyways, through time... This drug forced me to confront this anxiety and paranoia and now I don't have any problem talking to new people. Now, this could've happened naturally... But, I believe marijuana acted as a catalyst. posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Knn, I like you... you seem very liberal, however though... You have to be careful there is a very thin line between liberal and fascist. posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Evil Elvis Bush: I am not for the legalization of heroin, cocaine, or any other opiate-based drug or narcotic for that matter. Why not? A liberitarian government should not interfere with personal drug use use. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because there is factual, actually, repeat evidence to show these drugs are detriment to society... How many people go to rehab for marijuana? posted by Evil Elvis Bush |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 12 February 2012, 17:36 php B.B. |