|
|||
|
I'm tired and must sleep, and you are browbeating me becaue you don't like being insulted. I guess that's normal; however, this is not the insult thread, and constantly telling me that I am incapable of debate while you are continually debating me is rather contradictory. I also suspect that you are more than one person using the same username, laugh if you will, because your writing style has changed and I did some textual analysis in college. But that is unproveable. And I realize that I am not the best debater or science writer in the world, but I really have to say that a lot of the points you have raised are more political than scientific. Sometimes you touch on science, but usually you answer a scientific question with a political polemic, then pose a question of your own which always implies that your point of view, antipsychiatry, is the only acceptable one, and that because I can't answer all of your points, somehow I am incapable of debate. To tell you the truth, I am only interested in psychiatry out of personal necessity for survival, being schizoaffective, and really I like forensic psychology (the psychopathic personality disorder mainly) better than any of this. And I like paleontology. And of course, there is the fact that you posted a personal statement of opinion ("hate crimes" etc.) on a Wikipedia article and denounced my criticism thereof as slander. Plus you have threatened me with legal action on several occasions. Really I could care less about my legal status; however, I will tell you that if you didn't want insults posted on IMO with your name attached to them, you shouldn't have used your real name as your username. Change your username, and I will insult you by a different name. But make no mistake, I will insult you on this forum. Oh yes and keeping on topic: psychiatry and e fuller torrey and diagnosis and mindfreedombc posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsPsychiatry and Anti-PsychiatryThe Nature of Mental Illness |
|
|||
|
holy_of_holies: I'm tired and must sleep, and you are browbeating me becaue you don't like being insulted. I guess that's normal; however, this is not the insult thread, and constantly telling me that I am incapable of debate while you are continually debating me is rather contradictory. Actually, Holy, I'm debating -- you're flailing around. Quote: I also suspect that you are more than one person using the same username, laugh if you will, because your writing style has changed and I did some textual analysis in college. But that is unproveable. Indeed it is an unprovable (and wrong) assertion. Just like biomedical psychiatry is unprovable. Quote: And I realize that I am not the best debater or science writer in the world, but I really have to say that a lot of the points you have raised are more political than scientific. Sometimes you touch on science, but usually you answer a scientific question with a political polemic, then pose a question of your own which always implies that your point of view, antipsychiatry, is the only acceptable one, and that because I can't answer all of your points, somehow I am incapable of debate. To tell you the truth, I am only interested in psychiatry out of personal necessity for survival, being schizoaffective, and really I like forensic psychology (the psychopathic personality disorder mainly) better than any of this. And I like paleontology. Your vague accusations are unanswerable. I note, however, that you have nothing to say about the World Health Organization's findings that schizophrenics do better without treatment. If you were really interested in survival, you might want to look into why that's the case. Quote: And of course, there is the fact that you posted a personal statement of opinion ("hate crimes" etc.) on a Wikipedia article and denounced my criticism thereof as slander. As already stated, you did far more than object to my charge against E. Fuller Torrey. In fact, you deleted a link to an excellent article by a Pulitzer-nominated journalist. That's vandalism on Wikipedia and you had no right to do that. Quote: Plus you have threatened me with legal action on several occasions. Really I could care less about my legal status; however, I will tell you that if you didn't want insults posted on IMO with your name attached to them, you shouldn't have used your real name as your username. Change your username, and I will insult you by a different name. But make no mistake, I will insult you on this forum. I have threatened to have your internet privileges revoked. The reason for this is your abuse. I'm not changing my name. I'm not a little coward like yourself who hides behind what he thinks is anonymity. Let me tell you something, Holy: you're not anonymous. Quote: Oh yes and keeping on topic: psychiatry and e fuller torrey and diagnosis and mindfreedombc I'll post on whatever I want to post about. The topic was the "nature of mental illness." Psychiatric diagnosis, forced psychiatry and anti-psychiatry are all germane to that debate. The moderator has agreed with me on this. posted by Francesca Allan |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Francesca Allan: If you were really interested in survival, you might want to look into why that's the case. Hold it right there. That's a recruitment overture. Sorry "Francesca" but I won't join the MindFreedom cult. Francesca Allan: Quote: And of course, there is the fact that you posted a personal statement of opinion ("hate crimes" etc.) on a Wikipedia article and denounced my criticism thereof as slander. As already stated, you did far more than object to my charge against E. Fuller Torrey. In fact, you deleted a link to an excellent article by a Pulitzer-nominated journalist. That's vandalism on Wikipedia and you had no right to do that. It wasn't in the right section for links. Links go at the bottom of the article. Francesca Allan: Quote: Plus you have threatened me with legal action on several occasions. Really I could care less about my legal status; however, I will tell you that if you didn't want insults posted on IMO with your name attached to them, you shouldn't have used your real name as your username. Change your username, and I will insult you by a different name. But make no mistake, I will insult you on this forum. I have threatened to have your internet privileges revoked. The reason for this is your abuse. I'm not changing my name. I'm not a little coward like yourself who hides behind what he thinks is anonymity. Let me tell you something, Holy: you're not anonymous. Absolutely not! Though I can't help but perceive that as a threat. My profile has a link to my blog which contains my name and location; I'm really not trying to hide from anybody. Francesca Allan: Quote: Oh yes and keeping on topic: psychiatry and e fuller torrey and diagnosis and mindfreedombc I'll post on whatever I want to post about. The topic was the "nature of mental illness." Psychiatric diagnosis, forced psychiatry and anti-psychiatry are all germane to that debate. The moderator has agreed with me on this. Well aren't you proud of yourself? Let me tell you a little secret about knn dear: he hates psychiatry so much he just might let you get away with posting whatever you want, whenever you want, wherever you want on this forum. But you won't stop me from insulting you. And I WILL put the word out about MindFreedom and its cult brainwashing techniques. You have my word on that. posted by holy_of_holies |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
holy_of_holies: Francesca Allan: If you were really interested in survival, you might want to look into why that's the case. Hold it right there. That's a recruitment overture. Sorry "Francesca" but I won't join the MindFreedom cult. Holy, you wouldn't be welcome in MindFreedom, trust me. And I wasn't recruiting you. I was asking if you were interested in doing some serious and critical investigation into a branch of medicine that affects you greatly. Did you want to even take the trouble to read the World Health Organization studies? Or are you accusing the World Health Organization of being a cult, too? Francesca Allan: As already stated, you did far more than object to my charge against E. Fuller Torrey. In fact, you deleted a link to an excellent article by a Pulitzer-nominated journalist. That's vandalism on Wikipedia and you had no right to do that. Quote: It wasn't in the right section for links. Links go at the bottom of the article. But you didn't move it -- you deleted it -- because it threatens your little mind. Francesca Allan: Let me tell you something, Holy: you're not anonymous. Quote: Absolutely not! Though I can't help but perceive that as a threat. Take it any way that you want. Quote: Well aren't you proud of yourself? Let me tell you a little secret about knn dear: he hates psychiatry so much he just might let you get away with posting whatever you want, whenever you want, wherever you want on this forum. But you won't stop me from insulting you. And I WILL put the word out about MindFreedom and its cult brainwashing techniques. You have my word on that. Okay, little Holy, whatever you say, put down the knife please. You're going to have a hard time talking about the "MindFreedom cult" because there's no such thing. You're a nasty little man, aren't you? posted by Francesca Allan |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Francesca Allan: You're a sick and twisted little man, aren't you? Now, this is unfair. This is how the psychiatrists do it: Calling others mad. It's not fair. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: Francesca Allan: You're a sick and twisted little man, aren't you? Now, this is unfair. This is how the psychiatrists do it: Calling others mad. It's not fair. No, psychiatrists talk about "disorders." Holy is just a prick. That's quite a different thing. But I edited my post to make it clear I wasn't referring to his psychiatric troubles. posted by Francesca Allan |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey holy, you wrote it youself at IMO → KNN, Psychiatry Loves You and Has a Plan for Your Life#39310 about psychiatry: holy_of_holies: It's not a religion, and there's not much science involved in the practice of psychiatry : it's about educating and helping people. I would go so far as to suggest that given what we know about mental disorders, and the amount of people the US has incarcerated for minor or drug offenses usually linked to substance abuse and/or psychosis, what we really need are more psychiatric hospitals and fewer cops and prisons. IMO, of course. posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Francesca Allan: My primary concern is forced treatment forced treatment in what instance? can you elaborate? posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am closing this thread now. It is too broad and went offtopic several times and consists too many insults. If you want to contribute then start new focussed topics. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
it's not closed yet, muhahaha posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 24 May 2012, 18:51 php B.B. |