|
|||
|
For everyone, who's unfamiliar with the story, please click here: Only click here, if your stomach can handle blood: It was "The trial of the century", he's found not guilty during the criminal, yet guilty during the civil trial of murdering his ex-wife Nicole & her boyfriend. I saw interviews with So what do you think? If he didn't do it, who did? [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by a |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgReligion and Mysteries, from worship to werewolvesConspiracy theoriesIf O.J. didn't murder his ex-wife, then who did? |
|
|||
|
a: It was "The trial of the century", he's found not guilty during the criminal, yet guilty during the public trial of murdering his ex-wife Nicole & her boyfriend. The word you're looking for here is "civil," not "public." a: So what do you think? If he didn't do it, who did? I think OJ obviously did it, but that is not the main reason why I really dislike the man. The reason I very much dislike OJ as an American is that he always insisted that he was "looking for the real killers." What is he, Batman? I don't know how they do things out in California, but where I'm from, vigilantes - i.e. people who are not law enforcement officials but who still go out and "look for killers" - are criminals. So with that statement, "I'm looking for the real killers," OJ publicly declared himself to be above the law, just like the Ku Klux Klan was in the old days around where I live. That's why I don't like him, because I don't think we should have private citizens going around "looking for killers." That's anarchy. [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by MindSlave |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know, i also think he did it, but i'm still not 100% sure. If i imagine myself to his place & i'm not guilty: "My ex-wife & boyfriend are murdered, everybody is pointing at me, how'd i make them believe i'm innocent? I know: i'll say i'm looking for the real murders!" I mean, what'd you say to clear yourself if really everybody was against you? Anyway, what i was thinking of was that it's maybe possible, that some mad fan of O.J.'s did it, who thought he/she was helping/making O.J.'s life better with killing those ppl. P.s.: thx for correcting me posted by a |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
a: I mean, what'd you say to clear yourself if really everybody was against you? I don't know how it was overseas, but a lot of people in America at the time were not against OJ. There was a clear split along racial lines, many black people thinking he was innocent, and many white people thinking he was guilty. These days, if you talk to people about it, black or white, in my experience most of those with any sense agree that he probably did it, but there is still disagreement over whether he should have been acquitted or not due to the way the police handled the case. . posted by MindSlave |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 6 October 2008, 18:52 php B.B. |