|
|||
|
The earliest evidence of tattooing in Japan is found in the form of clay figurines which have faces painted or engraved to represent tattoo marks. The oldest figurines of this kind have been recovered from tombs dated 5,000 BC or older, and many other such figurines have been found in tombs dating from the second and the third millennia BC. These figurines served as stand-ins for living individuals who symbolically accompained the dead on their journey into the unknown, and it is believed that the tattoo had religious or magical significance.
The first written record of Japanese tattooing is found in a Chinese dynastic history compiled in 297 AD. According to this text Japanese "men young and old, all tattoo their faces and decorate their bodies with designs." Japanese tattooing is also mentioned in other Chinese histories, but always in a negative context. The Chinese considered tattooing a sign of barbarism and used it only as a punishment. By the seventh century the rulers of Japan had adopted much of the cultures and attitudes of the Chinese, and a result tattooing fell into official disfavor. The first record of tattooing as punishment is found in Japan in a Japanese history compiled in 720 AD. It reads "The Emperor summoned before him Marako, Humaji of Azumi, and commanded him saying: CE You plotted rebellion, and your offense is deserving of death. I will however exercise great bounty, and remitting the penalty of death, sentence you to be tattooed." After the sixth century tattooing was widely used to identify criminals and outcasts. Outcasts were tattooed on the arms: a cross might be tattooed on the inner forearm, or a straight line on the outside of the forearm or on the upper arm. Criminals were marked with a variety of symbols which designated the places where the crimes were comitted. In one region, the pictograph for "dog" was tattooed on the criminal's forehead. Other marks included such patterns as bars, crosses, double lines, and circles on the face and arms. Tattooing was reserved for those who had comitted serious crimes, and individuals bearing tattoo marks were ostracized by their families and denied all participation in the life of the community. For the Japanese, who valued family membership and social positions above all things, tattooing was particularly severe and terrible form of punishment. Isn't it funny how many consevative ppl still think now in 2005, that tattooed ppl are criminals or outcasts? Do you guys have any theories for what's the really reason why non-tattooed ppl disrespect tattooed ppl? [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by a |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgReligion and Mysteries, from worship to werewolvesConspiracy theoriesWhy are tattooed people disrespected? |
|
|||
|
a: Do you guys have any theories for what's the really reason why non-tattooed ppl disrespect tattooed ppl? Well, you've just posted one yourself. Criminals were once physically marked for their crime so that the rest of society would recognize them as a criminal. I'm pretty sure that tattoos back then for the criminals are not what most people with tattoos would have today (i.e. the Chinese character for dog on the forehead Another one is maybe because of Christian beliefs that the body is "a temple of God" and that doing anything to its natural form is disrespecting Him. But that is a very rare belief nowadays, since many, many, many Christians have piercings and tattoos, etc. I once visited a forum where the pastor and his wife were both "nearly covered" in tattoos. I think another idea is maybe that there is a stereotype that many times gangs have tattoos to mark themselves to be part of that gang, or to prove themselves to the gang. So in turn, everyone who has tattoos is marked as "the rowdier crowd." <- This idea is probably the one that holds the most truth. The other one was just a wild speculation. posted by nocturnal_anonymous |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
nocturnal_anonymous: I think another idea is maybe that there is a stereotype that many times gangs have tattoos to mark themselves to be part of that gang, or to prove themselves to the gang. So in turn, everyone who has tattoos is marked as "the rowdier crowd." Yes, members of the infamous Salvadoran gang MS 13 ♣ are noted for their heavy tattooing. posted by MindSlave |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
nocturnal_anonymous: a: Do you guys have any theories for what's the really reason why non-tattooed ppl disrespect tattooed ppl? Well, you've just posted one yourself. Criminals were once physically marked for their crime so that the rest of society would recognize them as a criminal. Yeah, in the far east, what's up with other places in the world? I get the gang-tattoo stereotype too, but only in those countries where gang-tattooes actually exist. Though i still don't understand what's wrong with innocent looking tattooes? [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by a |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
a: innocent looking tattoo Well, if you're talking about a pink flower on your hand, I'm pretty sure people would not disrespect you for that. I thought you were talking about something more prominent. posted by nocturnal_anonymous |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
You shouldn't be so sure...Well i'm not only talking about my tattooes - b/c many of my tattooed friends get disrespected too - but let's see: i've 5 roses & a shark art on my body, they aren't gang tattooes, right? Still, i got fired once, i didn't get another job once & i was called a whore a bunch of times b/c of them. & i got all this from non-asian, atheist ppl. Therefore i'd like to find out where's all this discrimination coming from. posted by a |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
a: Isn't it funny how many consevative ppl still think now in 2005, that tattooed ppl are criminals or outcasts? And it's true. Wealthy, successful high society members are seldomly tattoed (except for artists of course). Except for small tattoos somewhere near the foot ankle. People who are into tattoos are often socializing with people who are into body modification like heavy piercings, toe amputation, tongue splitting etc, as is proven by the fact that tattoo exhibitions feature very often these type of people. See also body modification posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: toe amputation posted by MindSlave |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
a: i've 5 roses & a shark art on my body, they aren't gang tattooes, right? Now you see, ONE pink flower on your hand does not attract that much attention. FIVE roses and a SHARK do. I guess... it just attracts too much attention. Especially in a work environment. The reason why employees are usually in uniform is because the company want the place to look clean, neat, and unified. For example, a manager of Albertsons probably would not want to hire a guy with a 2 feet mohawk as a cashier... for the same reason. posted by nocturnal_anonymous |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tattooing is seen as a sign of rebellion (against society, parents, etc.). Employers want "reliable" workers, so they discriminate against people with tattoos. posted by Sharaith |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
nocturnal_anonymous: Now you see, ONE pink flower on your hand does not attract that much attention. FIVE roses and a SHARK do. About 6 years ago i only had 1 rose tattooed on my back (not on my hand where everybody can see it, like the girl above). It was a hot summer afternoon & i was wearing a tank top on my day off (not for to work) & my friend & i met her boss. The next day her boss told my friend that my tattoo makes me look nasty & i will never get a good earning job b/c of it. My friend tried to tell her that it was my day off, but she wouldn't listen, from that day on she disrespected me. I'd like to add, my then boss (who later fired me for having multiple body art) took my side too & told the woman that i look just fine. Again we're talking about an atheist, non-asian individual, who saw my tattoo on my day off, not at work, so why the discrimination? posted by a |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe it's like what Sharaith said: Sharaith: Tattooing is seen as a sign of rebellion (against society, parents, etc.). Employers want "reliable" workers, so they discriminate against people with tattoos. posted by nocturnal_anonymous |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why are people running around with a huge dildo stuck to their forehead disrespected? The same answer applies to tattoos. posted by knn |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
knn: Why are people running around with a huge dildo stuck to their forehead disrespected? no knn, you are wearing it all wrong... it goes on your chin silly [CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS PICTURE] posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 6 October 2008, 19:57 php B.B. |