|
|||
|
World reaction: Democratic win welcomed
The seismic shift that midterm elections brought to Washington's political landscape was welcomed by many Wednesday in a world sharply opposed to the war in Iraq and outraged over the harsh methods the Bush administration has employed in fighting terrorism. From Paris to Pakistan, politicians, analysts and ordinary citizens said they hoped the Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives would force President Bush to adopt a more conciliatory approach to the globe's laundry list of crises, and teach a president many see as a "cowboy" a lesson in humility. ... Regardless of the effect on world events, global giddiness that Bush was finally handed a political black-eye was almost palpable throughout Europe, the Middle East and Asia. In an extraordinary joint statement, more than 200 Socialist members of the European Parliament hailed the American election results as "the beginning of the end of a six-year nightmare for the world" and gloated that they left the Bush administration "seriously weakened." In Paris, expatriates and French citizens alike packed the city's main American haunts to watch results, with some standing to cheer or boo as vote tabulations came in. One Frenchman, teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, 53, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew. "Americans are realizing that you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes," he said. "You can't fool everybody all the time -- and I think that's what Bush and his administration are learning today." Democrats swept to power in the House on Tuesday and were threatening to take control of the Senate amid exit polls that showed widespread American discontent over Iraq, nationwide disgust at corruption in politics, and low approval ratings for Bush. Bush is deeply unpopular in many countries around the globe, with particularly intense opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq, the U.S. terror detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and allegations of Washington sanctioned interrogation methods that some equate with torture. Many said they thought the big gains by Democrats signaled the beginning of the end of Bush's reign. The next presidential election is in November 2008. People across the Mideast also reacted swiftly, saying it appeared the U.S. president had paid the price for what many view as failed policy in Iraq. Al-Jazeera television said on its Web site that the elections had been shaped "by an unpopular war in Iraq" as well as scandals at home and dissatisfaction with Bush. Most governments across the region had no official comment, but some foes of the United States reacted harshly. "President Bush is no longer acceptable worldwide," said Suleiman Hadad, a lawmaker in Syria, whose autocratic government has been shunned by the U.S. Even some Iraqis voiced hope for change. "We hope American foreign policy will change and that living conditions in Iraq will improve," said 48-year-old engineer Suheil Jabar, a Shiite Muslim in Baghdad. In Copenhagen, Denmark, 35-year-old Jens Langfeldt said he did not know much about the midterm elections but was opposed to Bush's values. He referred to the president as "that cowboy." In Sri Lanka, some said they hoped the rebuke would force Bush to abandon a unilateral approach to global issues. "The Americans have made it clear that current American policy should change in dealing with the world, from a confrontational approach, to a more consensus-based and bridge-building approach," said Jehan Perera, a political analyst. The Democratic win means "there will be more control and restraint" over U.S. foreign policy. Passions were even higher in Pakistan, where Bush is deeply unpopular despite billions in aid and staunch support for President Gen. Pervez Musharraf. One opposition lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result but was hoping for more. Bush "deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence," he said. But while the result clearly produced more jubilation than jitters around the world, there also were some deep concerns. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told broadcaster TV2 he hoped that the president and the new Congress would find "common ground on questions about Iraq and Afghanistan." "The world needs a vigorous U.S.A.," Fogh Rasmussen said. Some also worried that Democrats, who have a reputation for being more protective of U.S. jobs going overseas, will make it harder to achieve a global free trade accord. And in China, some feared the resurgence of the Democrats would increase tension over human rights and trade and labor issues. China's surging economy has a massive trade surplus with the United States. "The Democratic Party ... will protect the interests of small and medium American enterprises and labor and that could produce an impact on China-U.S. trade relations," Zhang Guoqing of the state-run Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said in a report on Sina.com, one of China's most popular Internet portals. The prospect of a sudden change in American foreign policy could be troubling to U.S. allies such as Britain, Japan and Australia, which have thrown their support behind the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. Democrats campaigned on a platform that demanded a change of direction in Iraq, and the war has lost the support of the majority of American voters. "The problem for Arabs now is, an American withdrawal (from Iraq) could be a security disaster for the entire region," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst for the Gulf Research Center in Dubai. "The Mideast could be left to cope with a disintegrating Iraq mired in civil war, with refugees fleeing a failed state that could become an incubator for terrorism." The seismic shift? I don't think so. After all the wars and corruptions the country is basically still divided pretty exactly 50:50. I don't think you can talk about a seismic shift if the Republicans lose by a small margin of basically 49%:51% or so. Thus the above CNN portrays only statements that show ignorance about the great divide. posted by knn |
|||
|
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsBush, Kerry, IraqThe world celebrates as the Republicans are kicked out |
|
|||
|
Well, Bush won by a scant margin (and technically lost the first election), and yet he managed to single-handedly make the world hate Americans. The Democrats won by a scant margin, and maybe they'll manage to make a big difference in the other direction. It's very interesting, though, that the Republicans, due to Bush, have now gained worldwide animosity. posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tiefling: It's very interesting, though, that the Republicans, due to Bush, have now gained worldwide animosity. pretty annoying as well. not all republicans are as dumb as people think, and some really dumb people just call themselves democrats because they want to appear smart and "liberal," since apparently that's the thing now. but maybe that's just because i live in southern california. the democrats sweeping both houses of congress kind of scares me. i was okay with them taking the house, 'cause i personally do think bush needs 'fresh' eyes (or a lesson in humility, as cnn says) on the war, but their taking the senate too is a little too much for me. our economy is messed up enough, and the democrats have never done it any good ( esp with some dem senators wanting to freaking raise the minimum wage). but they say that all the time - hopefully those goals won't come true... posted by nocturnal_anonymous |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
na: our economy is messed up enough Under Clinton, there were budget surpluses. Under Bush, there have been record budget deficits of more than $400 billion. I wouldn't be too sure that Republicans are going to help out the economy too much. posted by Tiefling |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tiefling: I wouldn't be too sure that Republicans are going to help out the economy too much. hi tiefling! ahem...I guess the dow jones breaking records and at an all time high means nothing? posted by The ONEder Man |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
First of all, why would we care if the world hates us? It's not like they liked us 20 years ago, or for that matter 100 years ago. The Eurotrash has, and will always hate us. Moreover, the Islam nutt-jobs have been trying to kill us for centuries. We're hated regardless who's President. Simply, we are the only super power, and that pisses people off, but you can hate us, but you BETTER respect us. You can blame Bush for all of you troubles. You can blame him for everything; the war, your wieght problem, global warming, traffic, American Idol, but, truth be-known - he's the ONLY reason we're not having daily body counts on American city streets from Bus Bombs, and attacks. To be very candid, Americans that bitch and moan about how America is viewed overseas sickens me. Why, and I MEAN WHY, would you care what some third-world nation like England thinks about us? Again, not to be redundant, but FUCKUM! Look, we got our oil, we have our launching ground to attack Iran, and that's all we needed. It might take 100 years, but watch, we're going to sitting pretty good when it's all said and done with. So, for those who play patsie to all these Eurotrash liberals - go funk yourselves. posted by I hate the brits |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 22 August 2008, 04:18 php B.B. |