|
|||
|
Thanks, Agent Zero posted by ipsism |
|||
|
|||
| in-my-opinion.orgPoliticsBush, Kerry, IraqIraq is a battlefield! |
|
|||
|
To not ask the commander in Chief to REACT to a direct attack on our country would have sent the message of weekness. Reaction to the possibilities of a potential thret is an act of defense. To do nothing is an act of a coward. What should we expect our President to do when a situation arrises that appears as though we have ignored all potential thret (9-11) and an axis of evil stands out and boasts bad intention? He (President Bush) reacted in a maner that was expected ,I agree that the act of war should have more clear lines of intention ,but when there isn't a clear "front Line" or defined force to appose. The act of war will be very confusing... unless you are the one being shot at, then you know who the enemy is. To defend ourself from an enemy that is more or less invisible is like fist fighting under water. We as Americans need to allow the act of war to be just what it is, inhumane, violent and deadly. To be REACTIVE will only prolong the pain and promote more blood shed. We need to flood the area with all of our military force, turn up the heat untill our enemy has no place to hide, find them kill them then, KEEP IT SAFE untill all the bad are gone or dead. We need to stop the redicule and start to support our troops. Let our comander in cheif do the job he is being paid to do. The politiicial fight is the one that we are loosing and that is here not there.If we allow the propaganda to change the agenda than we have give the enemy the upper hand. If we are going to win this war against evil, we need to fight it without concern of the political effect wether it be ok with the politicly correct or not. The exit stradagy has been the only thing that has remained the same, TO WIN ! Then we can leave... As far as nothing to celibrate, I haven't seen any of them in my backyard, keeping tham out is a victory all by itself. Keeping them occupied is like giving the dog a bone to chew on.The more they talk the more we can listen. God bless our Country and the rest of the free world, keep us safe from all that is evil and protect those who have CHOSEN to defend us. This is a war that they started, do not give up or it will be the one that THEY will end. Do you like the way that THEY propose the world should be? posted by Denmar |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Denmar, if I understand you post, we are in agreement as to what must be done. We must WIN and WIN decisively. I have no disagreement with the retaliation against Afghanistan. I have no disagreement with taking out Saddham. He was in violation of the treaty signed after the 1991 war and 14 resolutions of the UN condemning him; he was given six weeks to allow inspections which would have averted the military action. And, his removal was not a retaliation for 9/11, it was because he had previously admitted having and allowing his troops to USE CBW against the Kurds and then refused to allow inspections as he had previously agreed to do. I do not blame Mr. Bush for the Islamists moving into Iraq. They moved into Iraq to continue to battle, not at Mr. Bush's invitation. They were ruthless, intentionally targeting Iraqi civilians to provoke turmoil. The complaint that I have with Mr. Bush is that he DID NOT unleash our troops to do what must be done and that he continues to direct our troops to wage a Muslim-sensitive war. This is an ideological war where the enemy seeks death to advance the cause of Islamic domination and subjugation of the world. It is a war against our society, currently located in but not limited to Iraq. It is a war that we must WIN. posted by ipsism |
|||
|
|||
|
The time now is 7 January 2009, 21:46 php B.B. |